This study addressed the significance of implementing ESG (Environmental, Social, Governance) management criteria in Ukrainian agriculture in the context of integration with the European Union during wartime and post-war reconstruction, which is becoming increasingly relevant due to the requirements of sustainable development and environmental protection, which are becoming an integral part of accession agreements. The purpose of this study was to substantiate the necessity of implementing ESG management criteria in the activities of Ukrainian agricultural enterprises to ensure sustainable development and integration of Ukraine into the EU during the period of martial law and post-war reconstruction. The key methods used included comparative analysis, evaluation method, SWOT analysis, and data synthesis. The aspects of environmental sustainability, social responsibility, and corporate governance and their interrelationships with the development of agriculture and rural areas in Ukraine were considered in detail. The study identified the value of environmental sustainability in the context of current challenges, such as climate change, soil degradation, and the need to preserve biodiversity, accommodate social aspects, ensure decent working conditions, develop rural communities, and improve the quality of life of the population through the implementation of responsible finance principles. The study identified strengths, weaknesses, opportunities, and threats that may arise on the path towards implementing ESG criteria in the management of agricultural enterprises through a SWOT analysis. Strengths include Ukraine’s natural potential, fertile land, and agricultural traditions. Weaknesses include insufficient infrastructure, financial resources, and technical support. Opportunities include integration into European markets, attracting foreign investment, and developing innovative technologies. Threats include the impact of climate change, geopolitical risks, and economic instability. The above analysis of the benefits of ESG criteria for the agricultural sector has its practical value, as it can help agricultural enterprises improve their production potential, increase their competitiveness in the market, and become potentially attractive to investors
reconstruction; principles of responsible finance; management; sustainable development; decision-making; social responsibility
[1] AR6 synthesis report. (2023). Retrieved from https://www.ipcc.ch/report/ar6/syr/.
[2] Bielik, P., Belinska, S., Bajusová, Z., Adamičková, I., Bullová, T., Belinska, Ya., & Husárová, P. (2024). Economic impact of using biomass for biogas production in the context of sustainable development. WSEAS Transactions on Business and Economics, 21, 1684-1697. doi: 10.37394/23207.2024.21.138.
[3] Clément, A., Robinot, É., & Trespeuch, L. (2022). Improving ESG scores with sustainability concepts. Sustainability, 14(20), article number 13154. doi: 10.3390/su142013154.
[4] Climate-smart agriculture. (n.d.). Retrieved from https://www.fao.org/climate-smart-agriculture/en/.
[5] Crop production will break even in 2024, while livestock profitability will decline –
Ministry of Agrarian Policy. (2024). Retrieved from https://minagro.gov.ua/news/u-2024-rotsi-roslynnytstvo-bude-bezzbytkovym-a-prybutkovist-tvarynnytstva-znyzytsia-minahropolityky.
[6] Directive of the European Parliament and of the Council No. 2014/95/EU “On Amending Directive 2013/34/EU as Regards Disclosure of Non-Financial and Diversity Information by Certain Large Undertakings and Groups”. (2014, October). Retrieved from https://eur-lex.europa.eu/eli/dir/2014/95/oj.
[7] EU agri-food trade achieved a record surplus in 2023. (2024). Retrieved from https://agriculture.ec.europa.eu/news/eu-agri-food-trade-achieved-record-surplus-2023-2024-04-05_20products.
[8] Fang, W. (2024). A study of the impact of ESG on corporate performance and firm valuation. Highlights in Business, Economics and Management, 40, 1071-1076. doi: 10.54097/qzxk2b75.
[9] Gernego, I., Petrenko, L., Lavrenenko, V., & Dyba, M. (2024). Challenges and opportunities of ESG investing. In New trends in contemporary economics, business and management selected proceedings of the 14th international scientific conference “Business and management 2024” (pp. 395-402). Latvia: Vilnius. doi: 10.3846/bm.2024.1223.
[10] Global Sustainable Development report. (2023). Retrieved from https://sdgs.un.org/gsdr/gsdr2023.
[11] Green Climate Fund. (n.d.). Retrieved from https://www.greenclimate.fund/.
[12] Gross domestic product for 2022. (2023). Retrieved from https://voxukraine.org/valovyj-vnutrishnij-produkt-za-2022-rik.
[13] Humanitarian demining of Ukraine: What the Ministry of Economy and Agriculture will do in 2024 to solve this problem. (n.d.). Retrieved from https://nv.ua/ukr/ukraine/events/2024-gumanitarne-rozminuvannya-plan-diy-ministerstva-ekonomiki-ta-agrarijiv-50381366.html.
[14] Kamakaula, Y. (2024). Sustainable agriculture practices: Economic, ecological, and social approaches to enhance farmer welfare and environmental sustainability. West Science Nature and Technology, 2(2), 47-54. doi: 10.58812/wsnt.v2i02.964.
[15] Kirzhetska, M., & Kirzhetskyy, Yu. (2022). Current aspects of sustainable business development according to ESG standards in Ukraine. Bulletin of the Lviv Polytechnic National University: Problems of Economics and Management, 6(2), 32-40. doi: 10.23939/semi2022.02.032.
[16] Kovalenko, N., Hutsol, T., Labenko, O., Glowacki, S., & Sorokin, D. (2021). Ecological and economical substantiation of production of hydrogen. In Proceedings of the international scientific and practical conference “Environment. Technologies. Resources” (pp. 127-131). Latvia: Rezekne. doi: 10.17770/etr2021vol1.6540.
[17] Lagodiyenko, O. (2022). Current aspects of ESG strategy development for the enterprise. Business Navigator, 3(70), 61-65. doi: 10.32847/business-navigator.70-11.
[18] Lagodiyenko, O., Uzhva, A., & Khakhaliev, D. (2024). Fiscal aspects of ESG business development concepts. Baltic Journal of Economic Studies, 10(3), 200-206. doi: 10.30525/2256-0742/2024-10-3-200-206.
[19] Law of Ukraine No. 1469-VIII “On the Ratification of the Paris Agreement”. (2016, July). Retrieved from https://zakon.rada.gov.ua/laws/show/1469-19#Text/.
[20] Makarenko, I.O. (2023). Incorporation of ESG criteria into the activities of companies in the context of their investment screening. Economy, Management and Administration, 2(104), 86-93. doi: 10.26642/ema-2023-2(104)-86-93.
[21] Metelytsia, V., & Gagalyuk, T. (2024). System of sustainability measurement in the agricultural sector. International Scientific Journal “Internauka”: Economic Sciences, 2(82), 50-61. doi: 10.25313/2520-2294-2024-2-9669.
[22] Mirzoyeva, T., & Gerasimchuk, N. (2023). Regarding risk assessment of agribusiness in the context of ESG development strategy. Economy and Society, 58. doi: 10.32782/2524-0072/2023-58-22.
[23] Neiter, R., Zorya, S., & Mulyar, O. (2024). Damages, losses and needs of agriculture due to full-scale invasion. Kyiv: Center for Foodand Land Use Research.
[24] Radzi, S.H.M., Hamid, N.A., & Ismail, R.F. (2023). An overview of environmental, social and governance (ESG) and company performance. In J. Said, D. Daud, N. Erum, N.B. Zakaria, S. Zolkaflil & N. Yahya (Eds.), Building a sustainable future: Fostering synergy between technology, business and humanity (pp. 1111-1122). London: European Publisher.
[25] Stakeholder theory. (n.d.). Retrieved from https://www.sciencedirect.com/topics/social-sciences/stakeholder-theory.
[26] Starikova, L. (2022). Common agricultural policy of the EU and tasks of Ukraine in the context of European integration: Plan for policy approximation and legislative harmonisation. Kyiv: Analytical Centre of the Agrarian Union of Ukraine.
[27] State Statistics Service of Ukraine. (n.d.). Retrieved from https://www.ukrstat.gov.ua/.
[28] Sustainable Development Goals. (n.d.). Retrieved from https://www.undp.org/uk/ukraine/tsili-staloho-rozvytku.
[29] Takril, N.F., Ika, S.R., Sabri, S.A., & Rafdi, N.J. (2023). Assessing the impact of environmental, social, and governance (ESG) factors on corporate performance: A literature review. In Proceeding of the 10th international conference on management and muamalah (pp. 318-323). Selangor: University Islam Selangor.
[30] The explosion of the Kakhovka HPP caused at least $2 billion in direct damage. (2023). Retrieved from https://kse.ua/ua/about-the-school/news/pidriv-kahovskoyi-ges-zavdav-ukrayini-shhonaymenshe-2-mlrd-pryamih-zbitkiv-pershi-obrahunki-kse-institute/.
[31] The impact of Russia’s war against Ukraine on the state of Ukrainian soils: Analysis results. (2023). Retrieved from https://ecoaction.org.ua/wp-content/uploads/2023/03/zabrudnennia-zemel-vid-rosii2.pdf.
[32] The new era of ESG and why it’s essential for business success. (2023). Retrieved from https://www.softserveinc.com/uk-ua/blog/the-new-era-of-esg.
[33] Tiurina, A., Kapelista, I., Omelchenko, A., Obykhod, H., & Pavliuk, S. (2021). Sustainable economic development of Ukraine through the agro-sector growth. Scientific Horizons, 24(12), 92-101. doi: 10.48077/scihor.24(12).2021.92-101.
[34] Ukraine receives candidate status for EU membership. (2022). Retrieved from https://www.kmu.gov.ua/news/ukrayina-otrimala-status-kandidata-na-chlenstvo-v-yes.
[35] Ukraine: The impact of the war on the profitability of agriculture. (2024). Retrieved from https://ucab.ua/ua/pres_sluzhba/novosti/prezentovano_noviy_vipusk_doslidzhennya_ukraina_vpliv_viyni_na_pributkovist_silskogospodarskogo_virobnitstva.
[36] Ukrainian agriculture in wartime: Resilience, reforms, and markets. (2023). Retrieved from https://www.tni.org/en/article/ukrainian-agriculture-in-wartime?translation=uk.
[37] What is ESG (environmental, social and governance)? (2024). Retrieved from https://www.techtarget.com/whatis/definition/environmental-social-and-governance-ESG.
[38] Zatonatskiy, D. (2023). Current trends in the formation of ESG mechanisms for investing in critical infrastructure. Efficient Economy, 12. doi: 10.32702/2307-2105.2023.12.31.