Fiscal instruments for supporting the financial security of agricultural enterprises in the face of global challenges

Olena Lemishko, Inna Lazaryshyna, Мykola Zos-Kior, Iryna Hnatenko, Olena Sirenko
Abstract

The aim of this study was to assess the role of fiscal instruments in maintaining the financial security of Ukraine’s agricultural enterprises in the context of military and global challenges. The research methodology was based on the application of systemic, institutional-normative, functional-analytical and statistical methods, which made it possible to analyse tax incentives, budgetary support, preferential lending, as well as the impact of inflation and monetary policy on the liquidity and solvency of agricultural enterprises. A summary of the results of the comprehensive analysis showed that the introduction of a minimum tax liability averaging around 1,400 UAH/ha was associated with increased transparency in land use, whilst simultaneously increasing the tax burden on farms with low margins. The differentiation of value-added tax rates (20%, 14% and 0%), combined with wartime tax relief, according to secondary sources, helped to reduce the cash flow gaps of individual enterprises by approximately 20-30%. Direct budgetary support in 2022-2025, estimated at between UAH 4 and 5 billion annually, as well as preferential lending, which exceeded UAH 104 billion in 2024, are seen as factors reducing debt servicing costs by approximately 15-20%. At the same time, the share of agricultural enterprises with insufficient absolute liquidity reached 74% in 2024. Peak inflation of 26.6% in 2022 and the National Bank of Ukraine’s increase of the discount rate to 25% significantly constrained the agricultural sector’s investment capacity. The directions for adapting fiscal mechanisms included the digitalisation of tax and budget administration, regional differentiation of tax and budgetary incentives, integration with European financial programmes, and the combination of fiscal, credit and insurance instruments to enhance the financial security of the agricultural sector. The practical significance of the study lies in the possibility of its results being used by public authorities to improve fiscal policy and by agricultural enterprises to enhance liquidity and financial stability in the face of wartime challenges

Keywords

liquidity; solvency; lending; subsidies; volatility; budgetary support

Suggested citation
Lemishko, O., Lazaryshyna, I., Zos-Kior, М., Hnatenko, I., & Sirenko, O. (2026). Fiscal instruments for supporting the financial security of agricultural enterprises in the face of global challenges. Economics and Business Management, 17(1), 121-140. https://doi.org/10.31548/economics/1.2026.121
References
  1. 7eminar. (2025). EUS – 2025: What has changed for entrepreneurs. Retrieved from https://7eminar.ua/news/4766-jesv-2025-shho-zminilosya-dlya-pidprijemciv.
  2. Agroreview. (2025). Basic taxes for farmers in Ukraine: What to pay in 2025. Retrieved from https://agroreview.com/content/agropolitics/osnovni-podatky-dlya-fermeriv-ukrayiny/.
  3. AgroTimes. (2022). Taxation innovations. Retrieved from https://agrotimes.ua/article/novacziyi-opodatkuvannya-silgospvyrobnykiv/.
  4. Al-Mujaddid, T.F., & Suwito, S. (2024). Adapting to the global economic downturn in Indonesia: Harnessing fiscal and monetary instruments. International Journal of Humanities Education and Social Sciences, 3(6), 2870-2878. doi: 10.55227/ijhess.v3i6.920.
  5. Castillo-Díaz, F.J., Belmonte-Ureña, L.J., Gálvez-Sánchez, F.J., & Camacho-Ferre, F. (2025). Sustainable technological innovations in agriculture: Financial challenges and investment priorities under the European Green Deal. Journal of Environmental Management, 389, article number 126150. doi: 10.1016/j.jenvman.2025.126150.
  6. Cisilino, F., & Licciardo, F. (2022). Potential and complexity of implementing financial instruments in the framework of rural development policies in Italy – The Friuli Venezia Giulia revolving fund. Sustainability, 14(23), article number 16090. doi: 10.3390/su142316090.
  7. Dankevych, V., Ivaniuk, O., & Akhmetov, I. (2025). The role of policy and economic framework conditions in shaping digitalisation in the agricultural sector in Ukraine. Scientific Horizons, 28(10), 32-43. doi: 10.48077/scihor10.2025.32.
  8. Danylyshyn, B. (2022). Inflationary processes in Ukraine and the world and their prospects. Retrieved from https://lb.ua/blog/bogdan_danylysyn/513069_inflyatsiyni_protsesi_ukraini_i_sviti.html.
  9. Dragan, O., Varchenko, O., & Zubchenko, V. (2023). Liquidity of agricultural enterprises in conditions of war. AIC Economics and Management, 2, 73-85. doi: 10.33245/2310-9262-2023-185-2-73-85.
  10. Electronic Taxpayer’s Cabinet. (n.d.). Retrieved from https://cabinet.tax.gov.ua/.
  11. EU4Business. (n.d.). Retrieved from https://eu4business.org.ua/.
  12. European Commission. (2014). Community-led local development. Retrieved from https://ec.europa.eu/regional_policy/en/information/publications/brochures/2014/community-led-local-development.
  13. European Commission. (n.d.a). “Ukraine Facility” tool. Retrieved from https://commission.europa.eu/topics/eu-solidarity-ukraine/eu-assistance-ukraine/ukraine-facility_uk.
  14. European Commission. (n.d.b). Common agricultural policy. Retrieved from https://agriculture.ec.europa.eu/common-agricultural-policy_en.
  15. European Investment Bank. (n.d.). Retrieved from https://www.eib.org/en/index.
  16. European Union. (2016a). Common Agricultural Policy – Pillar I. Retrieved from https://www.europarl.europa.eu/RegData/etudes/BRIE/2016/586622/EPRS_BRI(2016)586622_EN.pdf.
  17. European Union. (2016b). Common Agricultural Policy – Pillar II. Retrieved from https://www.europarl.europa.eu/RegData/etudes/BRIE/2016/586623/EPRS_BRI(2016)586623_EN.pdf.
  18. Evinita, L.L., Tangkau, J.E.M., Pesak, P.J., & Cahyono, S. (2025). Policy framework to improve MSME competitiveness and financial performance with Indonesia’s Asta Cita vision goals. Journal of Risk and Financial Management, 18(12), article number 692. doi: 10.3390/jrfm18120692.
  19. Feduniak, I.O., & Habor, W.S. (2025). Economic security of agricultural enterprises of small and medium businesses as a component of national security in war conditions. Agrosvit, 3, 111-116. doi: 10.32702/2306-6792.2025.3.111.
  20. Fesenko, V., Stupniker, H., & Motienko, S. (2022). Analysis of profitability of agricultural enterprises in Ukraine as a factor of increasing economic potential during martial law. Economy and Society, 46. doi: 10.32782/2524-0072/2022-46-29.
  21. Fomenko, V. (2022). Changes in VAT taxation during martial law. Retrieved from https://www.integrites.com/uk/publications/changes-regarding-vat-taxation-during-the-martial-law/.
  22. Gontagro. (2025). State support and financing of agriculture in Ukraine in 2025: What’s new and how it works for farmers. Retrieved from https://gontagro.com.ua/stati/articles_ua/state_support.
  23. Government portal. (2023). The Government of Ukraine approved the report on the implementation of the State Budget of Ukraine 2022. Retrieved from https://www.kmu.gov.ua/news/uriad-ukrainy-skhvalyv-zvit-pro-vykonannia-derzhavnoho-biudzhetu-ukrainy-2022.
  24. Government portal. (2025). Support for farmers in the 2026 budget: Restoration of production, demining and development of farming. Retrieved from https://www.kmu.gov.ua/news/pidtrymka-ahrariiv-u-biudzheti-2026-vidnovlennia-vyrobnytstva-rozminuvannia-ta-rozvytok-fermerstva.
  25. Huang, W., & Wang, X. (2024). The impact of technological innovations on agricultural productivity and environmental sustainability in China. Sustainability, 16(19), article number 8480. doi: 10.3390/su16198480.
  26. Indrawati, S.M., Satriawan, E., & Abdurohman. (2024). Indonesia’s fiscal policy in the aftermath of the pandemic. Bulletin of Indonesian Economic Studies, 60(1), 1-33. doi: 10.1080/00074918.2024.2335967.
  27. Interfax-Ukraine. (2025). Frontline regions need effective tools to support the economy of the territories – mayor of Kharkiv. Retrieved from https://interfax.com.ua/news/economic/1124838.html.
  28. Khakhula, B., Kostyuk, O., Lanchenko, O., Antonyuk, H., & Homon, O. (2024). Innovative tools for risk management of the production activities of agricultural enterprises in an institutional environment. Scientific Horizons, 27(2), 136-153. doi: 10.48077/scihor2.2024.136.
  29. Khan, F.U., Nouman, M., Negrut, L., Abban, J., Cismas, L.M., & Siddiqi, M.F. (2024). Constraints to agricultural finance in underdeveloped and developing countries: A systematic literature review. International Journal of Agricultural Sustainability, 22(1). doi: 10.1080/14735903.2024.2329388.
  30. Kostyrko, L., Solomatina, T., Kostyrko, R., Zaitseva, L., & Chernodubova, E. (2024). Financial strategy of agricultural enterprises in conditions of uncertainty: Methods, assessment, audit. Financial and Credit Activity Problems of Theory and Practice, 5(58), 207-224. doi: 10.55643/fcaptp.5.58.2024.4586.
  31. KPMG. (n.d.). Martial law: Changes in taxation. Expert explanations. Retrieved from https://kpmg.com/ua/uk/home/media/press-releases/2024/09/voyennyy-stan-zminy-v-opodatkuvanni.html.
  32. Kurdyś-Kujawska, A., Soliwoda, M., Grzelczak, M., & Apanel, A. (2025). Financial innovation in building agricultural sector resilience: New horizons and challenges for blended finance in Poland. Agriculture, 15(7), article number 754. doi: 10.3390/agriculture15070754.
  33. Kurkul. (2022). It became known which regions are leading in obtaining affordable agricultural loans. Retrieved from https://kurkul.com/news/32146-stalo-vidomo-yaki-regioni-lidiruyut-za-otrimannyam-dostupnih-agrokreditiv.
  34. Kurkul. (2024). New taxes 2024: Farmers will have to pay more. Retrieved from https://kurkul.com/spetsproekty/1658-novi-podatki-2024-fermeram-dovedetsya-platiti-bilshe.
  35. Latifundist Media. (2025). Minimum Tax Obligation (MTB) 2025: New rules for Ukrainian agrarians. Retrieved from https://latifundist.com/blog/read/3125-minimalne-podatkove-zobovyazannya-mpz-2025-novi-pravila-dlya-agrariyiv-ukrayini.
  36. Law of Ukraine No. 2120-IX “On Amendments to the Tax Code of Ukraine and Other Legislative Acts of Ukraine Regarding the Application of Norms for the Period of Martial Law”. (2022, March). Retrieved from https://zakon.rada.gov.ua/laws/show/2120-20#Text.
  37. Law of Ukraine No. 3050-IX “On Amendments to the Tax Code of Ukraine and Other Legislative Acts of Ukraine Regarding Exemption from Payment of Environmental Tax, Land Fee and Tax on Real Estate Other Than Land Plot for Destroyed or Damaged Real Estate”. (2023, April). Retrieved from https://zakon.rada.gov.ua/laws/show/3050-20#Text.
  38. Li, J., Liu, H., & Chang, W.-Y. (2024). Evaluating the effect of fiscal support for agriculture on three-industry integration in rural China. Agriculture, 14(6), article number 912. doi: 10.3390/agriculture14060912.
  39. Ma, Q., & Li, X. (2025). The impact of fiscal-financial synergistic support for agriculture on agricultural total factor productivity: Based on provincial panel data in China. International Review of Economics & Finance, 103, article number 104556. doi: 10.1016/j.iref.2025.104556.
  40. Ma, W., & Rahut, D.B. (2024). Climate-smart agriculture: Adoption, impacts, and implications for sustainable development. Mitigation and Adaptation Strategies for Global Change, 29, article number 44. doi: 10.1007/s11027-024-10139-z.
  41. Ma, W., Rahut, D.B., Sonobe, T., & Gong, B. (2024). Linking farmers to markets: Barriers, solutions, and policy options. Economic Analysis and Policy, 82, 1102-1112. doi: 10.1016/j.eap.2024.05.005.
  42. Manogna, R.L., & Kulkarni, N. (2024). Does the financialization of agricultural commodities impact food security? An empirical investigation. Borsa Istanbul Review, 24(2), 280-291. doi: 10.1016/j.bir.2024.01.001.
  43. MinfinMedia. (n.d.a). Inflation Index. Retrieved from https://index.minfin.com.ua/ua/economy/index/inflation/2025/.
  44. MinfinMedia. (n.d.b). NBU discount rate. Retrieved from https://index.minfin.com.ua/ua/banks/nbu/refinance/.
  45. Ministry of Agrarian Policy and Food of Ukraine. (2025). During 2024, 13,088 agricultural enterprises received almost 104.5 billion hryvnias in bank loans for development. Retrieved from https://minagro.gov.ua/news/13-088-ahrohospodarstv-otrymaly-bankivski-kredyty-mynuloho-roku.
  46. Ministry of Finance of Ukraine. (n.d.a). https://mof.gov.ua/uk/.
  47. Ministry of Finance of Ukraine. (n.d.b). VAT refund. Retrieved from https://mof.gov.ua/uk/vat-refund.
  48. National Bank of Ukraine. (2023). Commentary of the National Bank on the inflation rate in 2022. Retrieved from https://bank.gov.ua/ua/news/all/komentar-natsionalnogo-banku-schodo-rivnya-inflyatsiyi-u-2022-rotsi.
  49. Nesterov, O. (2022). War, agro, VAT: What’s new in the field of taxation. Retrieved from https://agroportal.ua/blogs/viyna-agro-pdv-shcho-novogo-v-sferi-opodatkuvannya.
  50. PrivatBank. (n.d.). PrivatBank is a participant in the program “Affordable loans 5-7-9%”. Retrieved from https://privatbank.ua/business/5-7-9.
  51. Prostir. (2023). Clarification for communities: Minimum tax liability – basic rules and requirements of the legislation. Retrieved from https://www.prostir.ua/?news=rozyasnennya-dlya-hromad-minimalne-podatkove-zobovyazannya-osnovni-pravyla-i-vymohy-zakonodavstva.
  52. PwC. (2021). From March 1, 2021, the VAT rate is reduced to 14% for certain agricultural products. Retrieved from https://www.pwc.com/ua/uk/publications/tax-and-legal-alert/2021/vat-agricultural-products.html.
  53. Resolution of the Cabinet of Ministers of Ukraine No. 560 “On Approval of the Procedure for Conscription of Citizens for Military Service During Mobilization, for a Special Period”. (2024, May). Retrieved from https://www.kmu.gov.ua/npas/pro-zatverdzhennia-poriadku-provedennia-pryzovu-hromadian-na-viiskovu-sluzhbu-pid-chas-mobilizatsii-na-osoblyvyi-period-560-160524.
  54. Sapych, V. (2024). Actual problems of financial support agricultural business of Ukraine in modern conditions. Sworld-Us Conference Proceedings, 1(usc23-01), 89-94. doi: 10.30888/2709-2267.2024-23-00-025.
  55. State Agrarian Register. (n.d.). Retrieved from https://www.dar.gov.ua/.
  56. State Tax Service of Ukraine in Sumy region. (2025). Regarding the peculiarities of the export of certain types of goods during the period of martial law. Retrieved from https://sumy.tax.gov.ua/media-ark/news-ark/print-877325.html.
  57. State Tax Service of Ukraine. (n.d.). Retrieved from https://tax.gov.ua/
  58. Stepanenko, O., & Kanelska, A. (2024). Financial stability of enterprises during the period of martial state: Risks, threats, ways to overcome them. Entrepreneurship and Innovation, 33, 123-130. doi: 10.32782/2415-3583/33.21.
  59. Vdovenko, L. (2022). Instruments of state financial support of the agricultural sector under the conditions of martial state. Economy and Society, 44. doi: 10.32782/2524-0072/2022-44-82.
  60. Yemets, R., & Borodkin, O. (2022). Tax reform during martial law. What was adopted on March 15? Retrieved from https://vkp.ua/publication/podatkova-reforma-v-period-voiennogo-stanu-shcho-priynyali-15-bereznya.
  61. Yuan, M., Hu, H., Xue, M., & Li, J. (2024). Framework for resilience strategies in agricultural supply chain: Assessment in the era of climate change. Frontiers in Sustainable Food Systems, 8, article number 1444910. doi: 10.3389/fsufs.2024.1444910.
  62. Zelisko, N., Raiter, N., Markovych, N., Matskiv, H., & Vasylyna, O. (2024). Improving business processes in the agricultural sector considering economic security, digitalization, risks, and artificial intelligence. Ekonomika APK, 31(3), 10-21. doi: 10.32317/2221-1055.2024030.10.