Budgetary mechanisms for stimulating environmental modernisation of agribusiness in Ukraine

Nataliia Shvets, Olena Lemishko, Zoya Titenko
Abstract

The aim of this study was to conduct a comprehensive analysis of the system of budgetary instruments for stimulating environmental transformation of the Ukrainian agricultural sector and to develop scientifically sound recommendations for optimising mechanisms of state financing for sustainable development of agricultural production. The methodological basis was formed by the principles of systematicity, objectivity and historicism, and structural-functional analysis, comparative analysis, content analysis and secondary data analysis were used to study the regulatory and legal framework, official reports and statistical materials for the period from 2024 to early 2025. A multi-level system of budgetary incentives was established with a funding volume of over UAH 24 billion in 2025, covering more than 300,000 beneficiaries through mechanisms ranging from direct grants to tax incentives. while a disproportion was identified between traditional subsidy programmes, which account for 70% of the total volume, and targeted environmental initiatives. A key trend has been the integration of environmental standards into financial programmes under the influence of international partners, as evidenced by the introduction of mandatory environmental and social assessments as part of the preferential lending programme, demonstrating an evolution from reactive support to proactive investment climate formation. The systematisation of European experience revealed Ukraine’s strategic dilemma between adapting to the standards of the European Union’s Common Agricultural Policy and maintaining the competitiveness of agricultural exports, while the practical results of implementing precision farming, bioenergy and organic production technologies have demonstrated the potential to reduce resource use by 15-25% while maintaining productivity. The main limitations to effectiveness are the fragmentation of environmental criteria in traditional support programmes, the difficulty of access to grant funding for small producers due to high co-financing requirements, and the lack of a comprehensive system for monitoring the environmental results of budget expenditures. The study has formed a scientific and methodological basis for improving state policy to stimulate the environmental modernisation of the agricultural sector through the creation of coordination platforms, the introduction of digital environmental monitoring systems, and the development of differentiated approaches to financing different categories of producers

Keywords

state support; financial instruments; grant programmes; subsidies; tax incentives

Suggested citation
Shvets, N., Lemishko, O., & Titenko, Z. (2026). Budgetary mechanisms for stimulating environmental modernisation of agribusiness in Ukraine. Economics and Business Management, 17(2), 28-53. https://doi.org/10.31548/economics/2.2026.28
References
  1. AgroPolit. (2019). Soil resources of Ukraine: Current state, degradation, protection. Retrieved from https://agropolit.com/infographics/view/93.
  2. Agroportal. (2023). Sustainable development and the green deal: What will be the paths of development for the agricultural sector in the process of European integration. Retrieved from https://agroportal.ua/publishing/lichnyi-vzglyad/staliy-rozvitok-ta-green-deal-yakimi-budut-shlyahi-rozvitku-agrosektoru-v-procesi-yevrointegraciji.
  3. Agroportal. (2025). CAP standards: What Ukrainian farmers need to know. Retrieved from https://agroportal.ua/blogs/standarti-smr-shcho-potribno-znati-ukrajinskomu-agrariyu.
  4. AHDB. (n.d.). Agricultural policy in Switzerland. Retrieved from https://ahdb.org.uk/trade-and-policy/uk-switzerland-FTA/agricultural-policy.
  5. Amaglobeli, D., Benson, T., & Mogues, T. (2024). Agricultural producer subsidies: Navigating challenges and policy considerations. IMF Notes, 2024(2). doi: 10.5089/9798400285950.068.
  6. Arhirova, H., & Stepanenko, V. (2025). Warren Buffett’s son is on track to donate $1 billion in aid to Ukraine this year – and pledges to continue despite Trump’s shaky relations. Retrieved from https://fortune.com/2025/04/07/warren-buffetts-son-is-on-track-to-donate-1-billion-in-aid-to-ukraine-this-year-and-pledges-to-continue-despite-trumps-shaky-relations/.
  7. BDF. (2025). Environmental assessment – a new condition for preferential loans under the “affordable loans 5-7-9%” program. Retrieved from https://bdf.gov.ua/ekolohichna-otsinka-nova-umova-dlia-pilhovoho-kredytu-v-mezhakh-prohramy-dostupni-kredyty-5-7-9/.
  8. Boix-Fayos, C., & de Vente, J. (2023). Challenges and potential pathways towards sustainable agriculture within the European green deal. Agricultural Systems, 207, article number 103634. doi: 10.1016/j.agsy.2023.103634.
  9. BrandStory. (n.d.). Organic: Top 15 most recognised organic brands in Ukraine. Retrieved from https://brandstory.com.ua/rejtingi/organic-ua-top-15-najvpiznavanisih-organicnih-brendiv-ukraini.
  10. Brenya, R., Akomea-Frimpong, I., Ofosu, D., & Adeabah, D. (2023). Barriers to sustainable agribusiness: A systematic review and conceptual framework. Journal of Agribusiness in Developing and Emerging Economies, 13(4), 570-589. doi: 10.1108/JADEE-08-2021-0191.
  11. Bucci, G., Bentivoglio, D., & Finco, A. (2018). Precision agriculture as a driver for sustainable farming systems: State of art in literature and research. Quality-Access to Success, 19, 114-121.
  12. Cabinet of Ministers of Ukraine. (2022). More than 17,000 agricultural producers are participants in the state support program in the state agricultural register. Retrieved from https://www.kmu.gov.ua/news/ponad-17-tys-ahrovyrobnykiv-ie-uchasnykamy-prohramy-derzhpidtrymky-u-derzhavnomu-ahrarnomu-reiestri.
  13. Cabinet of Ministers of Ukraine. (2024). Grant funds worth UAH 723 million have been invested in horticulture and greenhouse farming over the past year and a half under the eRobota program: Denys Shmyhal. Retrieved from https://www.kmu.gov.ua/en/news/za-prohramoiu-ierobota-u-sadivnytstvo-i-teplychne-hospodarstvo-za-ostanni-pivtora-roku-investovano-723-mln-hrn-hrantovykh-koshtiv-denys-shmyhal.
  14. CAP. (2024). Retrieved from https://www.dossier.org.ua/wp-content/uploads/2024/05/CAP_lawclimate_UA.pdf.
  15. Chaszmin. (n.d.). Grants for farmers. Retrieved from https://chaszmin.com.ua/granty-dlya-agrariyiv/.
  16. Chepeliev, M., Diachuk, O., Podolets, R., & Trypolska, G. (2021). The role of bioenergy in Ukraine’s climate mitigation policy by 2050. Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, 152, article number 111714. doi: 10.1016/j.rser.2021.111714.
  17. Cuadros-Casanova, I., Cristiano, A., Biancolini, D., Cimatti, M., Sessa, A.A., Mendez, A.V.Y., Dragonetti, C., Pacifici, M., Rondinini, C., & Di Marco, M. (2023). Opportunities and challenges for common agricultural policy reform to support the European green deal. Conservation Biology, 37(3), article number e14052. doi: 10.1111/cobi.14052.
  18. DAR. (n.d.). Retrieved from https://dar.gov.ua.
  19. Dees, M., et al. (2017). Atlas with regional cost supply biomass potentials for EU 28, Western Balkan countries, Moldavia, Turkey and Ukraine. Freiburg: University of Freiburg.
  20. Diia. (n.d.). Retrieved from https://diia.gov.ua/.
  21. Dnepragro. (2025). Green modernization of the agricultural sector 2025: The main agricultural event of the last two months in Ukraine. Retrieved from https://www.dnepragro.com/zelena-modernizatsiya-apk-2025-golovna-agrarna-podiya-ostannih-dvoh-misyatsiv-v-ukrayini/.
  22. EBA. (2025). BDO in Ukraine: On state support for agribusiness during the war. Retrieved from https://eba.com.ua/bdo-v-ukrayini-pro-derzhavnu-pidtrymku-agrobiznesu-pid-chas-vijny/.
  23. Ehlers, M.-H., Huber, R., & Finger, R. (2021). Agricultural policy in the era of digitalisation. Food Policy, 100, article number 102019. doi: 10.1016/j.foodpol.2020.102019.
  24. European Bank for Reconstruction and Development (EBRD). (2024). EBRD, EU and Greencubator support Ukrainian innovators. Retrieved from https://www.ebrd.com/news/2024/ebrd-eu-and-greencubator-support-ukrainian-innovators.html.
  25. European Commission. (2022). The commission approves the CAP strategic plan of the Netherlands. Retrieved from https://agriculture.ec.europa.eu/media/news/commission-approves-cap-strategic-plan-netherlands-2022-12-13_en.
  26. European Commission. (2023). Organic farming in the EU: A decade of growth. Retrieved from https://agriculture.ec.europa.eu/media/news/organic-farming-eu-decade-growth-2023-01-18_en.
  27. European Commission. (n.d.). Retrieved from https://agriculture.ec.europa.eu/common-agricultural-policy/income-support/conditionality_en.
  28. European External Action Service. (2024). FAO and the European Union (EU) launch third grant cycle to enhance sustainability of Ukrainian farmers. Retrieved from https://www.eeas.europa.eu/delegations/ukraine/fao-and-european-union-eu-launch-third-grant-cycle-enhance-sustainability-ukrainian-farmers_en.
  29. European Parliament. (2024). Ukrainian agriculture: From Russian invasion to EU integration. Retrieved from https://epthinktank.eu/2024/04/15/ukrainian-agriculture-from-russian-invasion-to-eu-integration/.
  30. FAO. (2019). FAO regional office for Europe and Central Asia. Retrieved from https://www.fao.org/europe/news/detail/FAO-launches-training-courses-to-help-farmers-stop-land-degradation-in-Ukraine/en.
  31. Ferreira, H., Pinto, E., & Vasconcelos, M.W. (2021). Legumes as a cornerstone of the transition toward more sustainable agri-food systems and diets in Europe. Frontiers in Sustainable Food Systems, 5, article number 694121. doi: 10.3389/fsufs.2021.694121.
  32. Galkin, V.V. (2025). The impact of state financing on innovation activity in agriculture. Innovative Science: Searching for Answers to Contemporary Challenges, 68-73.
  33. Gonzalez-de-Santos, P., et al. (2017). Fleets of robots for environmentally-safe pest control in agriculture. Precision Agriculture, 18, 574-614. doi: 10.1007/s11119-016-9476-3.
  34. Greenpost. (2025). “Investment cashback” of up to 70%: Businesses are offered tax incentives for investments in processing. Retrieved from https://greenpost.ua/news/v-radi-gotuyut-investytsijnyj-keshbek-do-70-za-vkladennya-u-pererobnu-promyslovist-i94943.
  35. Growhow. (2025). $150 million for rural revitalization: FAO launches a two-year program to support Ukrainian farmers. Retrieved from https://www.growhow.in.ua/150-milyoniv-dolariv-dlia-vidnovlennia-sela-fao-zapuskaie-dvorichnu-prohramu-pidtrymky-ahrariiv-ukrainy/.
  36. Guyomard, H., Détang-Dessendre, C., Dupraz, P., Delaby, L., Huyghe, C., Peyraud, J.-L., Reboud, X., & Sirami, C. (2023). How the green architecture of the 2023-2027 common agricultural policy could have been greener. Ambio, 52, 1327-1338. doi: 10.1007/s13280-023-01861-0.
  37. Hardaker, J.B., Lien, G., Anderson, J.R., & Huirne, R.B.M. (2015). Coping with risk in agriculture: Applied decision analysis (3rd ed.). Tarxien: Gutenberg Press Ltd.
  38. Havemann, T., Negra, C., & Werneck, F. (2022). Blended finance for agriculture: Exploring the constraints and possibilities of combining financial instruments for sustainable transitions. In G. Desa & X. Jia (Eds.), Social innovation and sustainability transition (pp. 347-358). Cham: Springer. doi: 10.1007/978-3-031-18560-1_23.
  39. Hrynevych, O., Canto, M.B., & García, M.J. (2022). Tendencies of precision agriculture in Ukraine: Disruptive smart farming tools as cooperation drivers. Agriculture, 12(5), article number 698. doi: 10.3390/agriculture12050698.
  40. Khanal, S., Fulton, J., & Shearer, S. (2017). An overview of current and potential applications of thermal remote sensing in precision agriculture. Computers and Electronics in Agriculture, 139, 22-32. doi: 10.1016/j.compag.2017.05.001.
  41. Kovalenko, M. (2025). What are the programs to support the agricultural sector in Ukraine – an overview. Retrieved from https://dyvys.info/2025/05/27/yaki-ye-programy-pidtrymky-agrosektoru-v-ukrayini-oglyad/.
  42. Landlord. (2023). USAID is investing over 70 million hryvnia in pilot projects to modernize irrigation in Ukraine. Retrieved from https://landlord.ua/news/usaid-investuie-ponad-70-milioniv-hryven-u-pilotni-proiekty-modernizatsii-zroshennia-v-ukraini/.
  43. Landlord. (2024). As part of the EU accession process, Ukraine is considering exchanging agricultural subsidies for a relaxation of environmental policy requirements. Retrieved from https://landlord.ua/news/ukrayina-v-mezhah-vstupu-do-yes-rozglyadaye-obmin-agrosubsydiyi-na-pomyakshennya-vymog-zelenogo-kursu/.
  44. Larianova, K., & Kapinos, G. (2025). The role of agricultural enterprise lending in agrarian business development and achieving Ukraine’s sustainable development goals under martial law. Modeling the Development of the Economic Systems, 1, 78-86. doi: 10.31891/mdes/2025-15-11.
  45. Law of Ukraine No. 1877-IV “On the Principles of the State Agrarian Policy and the State Rural Development Policy”. (2004, June). Retrieved from https://online.budstandart.com/ua/catalog/doc-page.html?id_doc=105319.
  46. Lawoffice. (n.d.). Grant support for individual farmers and small farms in 2023. Retrieved from https://lawoffice.in.ua/articles/grantova_pidtrimka_fermeriv.htm.
  47. MacPherson, J., Voglhuber-Slavinsky, A., Olbrisch, M., Schöbel, P., Dönitz, E., Mouratiadou, I., & Helming, K. (2022). Future agricultural systems and the role of digitalization for achieving sustainability goals: A review. Agronomy for Sustainable Development, 42, article number 70. doi: 10.1007/s13593-022-00792-6.
  48. Maeder, P., Fliessbach, A., Dubois, D., Gunst, L., Fried, P., & Niggli, U. (2002). Soil fertility and biodiversity in organic farming. Science, 296(5573), 1694-1697. doi: 10.1126/science.1071148.
  49. Melchior, I.C., & Newig, J. (2021). Governing transitions towards sustainable agriculture – taking stock of an emerging field of research. Sustainability, 13(2), article number 528. doi: 10.3390/su13020528.
  50. Ministry of Agrarian Policy and Food of Ukraine. (2022). Participation in all state and international support programs for farmers is currently only possible through DAR or Diya. Retrieved from https://www.kmu.gov.ua/news/minagropolitiki-uchast-u-vsih-programah-derzhavnoyi-ta-mizhnarodnoyi-pidtrimki-dlya-agrariyiv-na-sogodni-mozhliva-viklyuchno-cherez-dar-abo-diyu.
  51. Ministry of Economy of Ukraine. (2025). Only agricultural producers registered with the state agency for agrarian policy will receive compensation for 25% of the cost of Ukrainian agricultural equipment, according to a government resolution. Retrieved from https://me.gov.ua/News/Detail/90386300-9d14-4dea-8d2b-eda863499635.
  52. Ministry of Finance of Ukraine. (2024). During martial law, entrepreneurs received 60,317 loans worth UAH 237.5 billion under the “affordable loans 5-7-9%” program. Retrieved from https://mof.gov.ua/uk/news/minfin_za_chas_dii_voiennogo_stanu_pidpriiemtsi_otrimali_60_317_kreditiv_na_2375_mlrd_grn_za_programoiu_dostupni_krediti_5-7-9-4780.
  53. Nivievskyi, O. (2024). EU integration of Ukraine – assessing the challenges for agri-food public authorities. SSRN. doi: 10.2139/ssrn.4957056.
  54. NV. (2024). Ukraine knew that Russia would blow up the Kakhovka hydroelectric power plant but did not expect the scale of the destruction. Retrieved from https://nv.ua/ukr/ukraine/events/pidriv-kahovskoji-ges-u-2023-roci-ukrajina-znala-pro-plani-rosiyan-povidomili-v-ukrgidroenergo-50425105.html.
  55. Olajide, B.T., Mojeed, T.A., Nzekwe, C.C., Udo, D.I., Fawedikimo, S., & Azino, O. (2025). Financing sustainable agribusiness in a changing climate: Investment, incentives, and levers for food system transformation. African Journal of Agricultural Science and Food Research, 19(1), 247-266. doi: 10.62154/ajasfr.2025.019.01026.
  56. Organicinfo. (2024). Results of 2024 in the organic sector. Retrieved from https://organicinfo.ua/en/news/results-of-2024/.
  57. Pe’er, G., et al. (2022). How can the European common agricultural policy help halt biodiversity loss? Recommendations by over 300 experts. Conservation Letters, 15(6), article number e12901. doi: 10.1111/conl.12901.
  58. Regulation of the European Parliament and of the Council No. 1305 “On Support for Strategic Plans to be drawn up by Member States under the Common Agricultural Policy”. (2021, December). Retrieved from https://eur-lex.europa.eu/eli/reg/2021/2115/oj/eng.
  59. ReliefWeb. (2024). In 2024, crop production will break even, and the profitability of livestock production will decrease – Ministry of Agrarian Policy and Food of Ukraine. Retrieved from https://reliefweb.int/report/ukraine/2024-crop-production-will-break-even-and-profitability-livestock-production-will-decrease-ministry-agrarian-policy-and-food-ukraine-enuk.
  60. Research Institute of Organic Agriculture (FiBL). (2024). Ukrainian organic agriculture will not be defeated by the war. Retrieved from https://www.fibl.org/en/info-centre/news/ukrainian-organic-agriculture.
  61. Resolution of the Cabinet of Ministers of Ukraine No. 130 “On Approval of the Procedure for Using Funds Provided for in the State Budget for Partial Compensation of the Cost of Domestically Produced Agricultural Machinery and Equipment”. (2017, March). Retrieved from https://zakononline.com.ua/documents/show/385204___784182.
  62. Resolution of the Cabinet of Ministers of Ukraine No. 738 “On Some Issues Regarding the Provision of Grants to Businesses”. (2022, June). Retrieved from https://ips.ligazakon.net/document/kp230286.
  63. Resolution of the Cabinet of Ministers of Ukraine No. 918 “On Approval of the Procedure for Using Funds Provided for in the State Budget to Support Farms and Other Agricultural Producers”. (2022, August). Retrieved from https://zakon.rada.gov.ua/laws/show/918-2022-%D0%BF#Text.
  64. Rudnicki, R., Biczkowski, M., Wiśniewski, Ł., Wiśniewski, P., Bielski, S., & Marks-Bielska, R. (2023). Towards green agriculture and sustainable development: Pro-environmental activity of farms under the common agricultural policy. Energies, 16(4), article number 1770. doi: 10.3390/en16041770.
  65. Runge, T., et al. (2022). Implementation of eco-schemes in fifteen European Union Member States. EuroChoices, 21(2), 19-27. doi: 10.1111/1746-692X.12352.
  66. Santiago-Freijanes, J.J., Mosquera-Losada, M.R., Rois-Díaz, M., Ferreiro-Domínguez, N., Pantera, A., Aldrey, J.A., & Rigueiro-Rodríguez, A. (2021). Global and European policies to foster agricultural sustainability: Agroforestry. Agroforestry Systems, 95, 775-790. doi: 10.1007/s10457-018-0215-9.
  67. Scarlat, N., Dallemand, J.-F., Monforti-Ferrario, F., Banja, M., & Motola, V. (2015). Renewable energy policy framework and bioenergy contribution in the European Union – an overview from national renewable energy action plans and progress reports. Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, 51, 969-985. doi: 10.1016/j.rser.2015.06.062.
  68. Skoryk, Y. (2024). Ukraine’s economy grew by 4% over the year, with the agricultural sector accounting for 20% of GDP. Retrieved from https://finway.com.ua/ekonomika-ukrayiny-zrosla-rik-agrosektor/.
  69. Suspilne Chernihiv. (2021). Good for the soil, but economically risky: Organic farming in Chernihiv region. Retrieved from https://suspilne.media/chernihiv/135324-korisno-dla-gruntu-ale-ekonomicno-rizikovano-organicne-zemlerobstvo-na-cernigivsini/.
  70. UASP. (n.d.). Financial assistance to households engaged in agricultural activities and small farmers. Retrieved from https://uasp.mercycorps.org/about/YqYeMkng.
  71. Ukrainian Bioenergy Association. (n.d.). Bioenergy transition in Ukraine. Retrieved from https://uabio.org/en/bioenergy-transition-in-ukraine/.
  72. Vaskina, I., Pochwatka, P., Vaskin, R., Adamski, M., Nowak, M., & Dach, J. (2025). Ukraine’s biogas potential: A comprehensive assessment of energy yields and of feedstock availability. Sustainable Energy Technologies and Assessments, 81, article number 104412. doi: 10.1016/j.seta.2025.104412.
  73. Verkhovna Rada of Ukraine. (2024). Committee hearings were held on the topic: “State support for the agricultural sector 2024: Public and private funds and mechanisms”. Retrieved from https://www.rada.gov.ua/news/news_kom/247281.html.
  74. Wang, T., Yu, Z., Ahmad, R., Riaz, S., Khan, K.U., Siyal, S., Chaudhry, M.A., & Zhang, T. (2022). Transition of bioeconomy as a key concept for the agriculture and agribusiness development: An extensive review on ASEAN countries. Frontiers in Sustainable Food Systems, 6, article number 998594. doi: 10.3389/fsufs.2022.998594.
  75. Wesseler, J. (2022). The EU’s farm‐to‐fork strategy: An assessment from the perspective of agricultural economics. Applied Economic Perspectives and Policy, 44(4), 1826-1843. doi: 10.1002/aepp.13239.
  76. Willer, H., Trávníček, J., & Schlatter, B. (Eds.). (2024). The world of organic agriculture 2024: Statistics and emerging trends 2024. Frick: FiBL.
  77. World Bank Group. (2023). Farmers in Ukraine to benefit from world bank support. Retrieved from https://www.worldbank.org/en/news/press-release/2023/10/30/farmers-in-ukraine-to-benefit-from-world-bank-support.
  78. Yatsun, A., & Vdovenko, N. (2024). Financial instruments for sustainable development in the context of modeling Ukraine’s agricultural sector. Acta Academiae Beregsasiensis. Economics, 5, 230-245.
  79. Zasada, I., et al. (2019). Food beyond the city – analysing foodsheds and self-sufficiency for different food system scenarios in European metropolitan regions. City, Culture and Society, 16, 25-35. doi: 10.1016/j.ccs.2017.06.002.
  80. Zastavnyi, Y.B. (2021). Financial and economic stimulation of organic agricultural production development at the level of united territorial communities. Economy and State, 4, 169-174. doi: 10.32702/2306-6806.2021.4.169.